This is artwork! Any attempt to interpret as science is part of the performance...

satirical artwork: ladical-reft! by tunalix

This is a path.
It is not a fully developed highway!
There are many bridges to be built and many tunnels to be dug.
But perhaps we can achieve an emotional science
that brings forth an empathetic administration!

Prolegomena: Relationality Theory understands itself as an interdisciplinary model of reality that seeks to overcome the materialistic reductionism of science by re-establishing the spirit (mind). The model explores consciousness as a fundamental quality of relations; it therefore evades measurability and remains persistently unscientific. It does not wish to be a dogma, but a tool for the creative spirit.

Relationality Theory postulates that reality consists not of matter, but of relationships. The universe is a dynamic, fractal web in which the "Self" is not an isolated observer, but an active local node within a universal process of exchange.

1. The Core of the Theory: Consciousness as a State of Order

In contrast to classical physics, Relationality Theory views energy not as a partially material state, but as the immaterial intensity of a resonance. In this model, consciousness shifts from being a passive observer to an active operator of its own timeline. To make this possible, we need the insights of Luigi Fantappié of syntropy, presented in Principi di una Teoria Unitaria del Mondo Fisico e Biologico (1944). Building on this, consciousness is defined here as a lived relationship between order and decay..

The Principles of Creation

All of reality is shaped by the dynamic field of tension between two fundamental principles:

• Entropy ($S$): The thermodynamic principle of dispersal, dissolution, and causal binding to the past: Chronos ($t$). The physical time as it stands in the denominator of $c^2$; it passes mechanically and "cools" the system down.
• Syntropy ($\sigma$): Luigi Fantappié’s principle of collection, integration, and coherence. A teleological orientation toward a meaningful future: Kairos ($\tau$). The time of the operator (presence) acting from the future—and precisely for this reason, it remains scientifically controversial.

The Identity of Consciousness

Consciousness is the lived ratio—the operator itself—mediating between future-oriented order ($\sigma_{\tau}$) and progressive material dissolution ($S_t$).

Mathematically, this state can be described as a relation:

$$\text{Consciousness}_{(\tau, t)} = \left(\frac{\sigma_{\tau}}{S_t}\right)$$

Without an external world, this remains a closed system, which inevitably falls prey to entropy.

Although Dirac notation $\langle \sigma_{\tau} | S_t \rangle$ maps the superposition of states within this relation more precisely from a technical standpoint, artistic freedom allows the model to retain the fractional representation $\frac{\sigma}{S}$ to facilitate the mathematical handling of potential differences.

The Local "Self"

The individual Self corresponds to a local unit in which general syntropy is concentrated onto a specific focal point (numerator = 1), relative to one's own local entropy $S_{local}$:

$$\text{Self} = \left(\frac{1}{S_{myown(t)}}\right)$$

The Dynamics of Exchange (The Open System)

In open systems, the individual acts as an agent of their own state. By consciously altering the local time-ratio ($\sigma_{\tau} / S_t$) and exchanging energy with the outside world, the operator changes their resonance capacity with the external field. Emotions such as joy or fear function as sensors for thermodynamic state changes and as directional indicators for future desired states:

• Syntropic Resonance: Connection, cooperation, and devotion increase local presence ($\tau$). Coherence rises and expands access to the external field. $\quad\to\quad \text{Joy / Love}$
• Entropic Dissonance: Conflict, destruction, and isolation cause the system to freeze in mechanical time ($t$). Local entropy increases. $\quad\to\quad \text{Fear / Suffering}$

This process occurs partially through the exchange of resonance packets: One operator can offer another a "packet of low entropy" (love, comfort) or one of "high entropy" (hate, violence). This is a transfer of pure syntropy ($\sigma_{\tau}$) or entropy ($S_t$), which costs the giver no material substance, yet allows the receiver to modify their local entropic load ($S_t$). The resulting feedback (e.g., gratitude) can stabilize the resonance bridge ($\uparrow \sigma$), increase the collective energy potential, and lower the total entropy of the system ($\downarrow S$).

The Equation of Resonance

Energy ($E$) is understood in this model as the flow that arises when two time-systems strike a resonance bridge and oscillate in phase with one another:

$$E = \left( \frac{\sigma_{\tau}}{S_t} \right)_{local} \longleftrightarrow \left( \frac{\sigma_{\tau}}{S_t} \right)_{external}$$

“I am capable of casting an idea as an anchor into the future and drawing my material world toward it!”

2. The Mathematics of Relationality

The following calculations are incomplete, flawed, and to be regarded as purely conceptual—it is a path, not a highway!

In classical physics, $E=mc^2$ describes the equivalence of energy and mass. In this expansion, however, energy becomes the expression of the ratio between future-oriented order ($\sigma_{\tau}$) and past dissolution ($S_t$).

The Relationality Equation (Expansion of Equivalence)

1. The Unity State ($t = 0$)

We define the total energy $E$ at the moment of origin $t=0$ as the absolute unit $E=1$. This unit represents the perfect balance (symmetry) between the two primal vectors:

$$E_0 = \frac{\sigma_{\tau}}{S_t} = 1$$

At $t=0$, there is no separation. Relationality is infinite, matter $m$ is not yet "frozen"—it is pure potential.

2.2 The Symmetry Break (Fractal Division)

The moment time (conscious self-reflection, "I am") begins, the process of fractal division is set in motion. The Unity divides itself into the relation "I am" and "I might not be," but instead of a simple halving, a self-similar structure emerges:

$$E = \frac{"I\ am" + "not"}{2} = \frac{"I"}{2} + \frac{is\ it\ You?}{2} = \frac{2}{2} = 1$$

$$\dots \to \frac{Me}{4} + \frac{You}{4} + \frac{Him}{4} + \frac{Her}{4} = \frac{4}{4} = 1$$

$$\dots \to \frac{We}{All} = \frac{2^k}{2^k} \to \frac{\infty}{\infty} = 1 = \text{Me!}$$

This becomes dynamic: each level $k$ generates $2^k$ new fragments. While the material share per fragment $(1/2)^k$ decreases (Entropy $S_t$), the total energy summed over all levels reaches infinity:

$$E_{\text{fractal}} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} 2^k \cdot \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^k = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} 1 = \infty$$

The Secret of Resonance Density:
Parallel to the fractal division, the number of possible relations ($R$) between operators explodes. While the material "mass" per capita shrinks, the networking complexity grows quadratically:

$$R = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$$

The Relational Paradox:
Anyone attempting to prevent division ($n=1$) in order to keep their share at $100%$ ends up at $R=0$. One possesses the whole but experiences nothing, as no relation exists to transmit energy. Sharing does not halve—it multiplies! While the material world appears to grow poorer through division, consciousness ignites a "sun" by trading material exclusivity for relational infinity.

Navigator's Note: No matter is capable of taking the first step "I am!" and no matter is capable of measuring it!

3. Matter as "Braked" Time-Resonance

If we lead this back into Einstein's formula, we obtain a new view of mass $m$:

$$m = \frac{E}{c^2} \implies m = \frac{\sigma_{\tau} / S_t}{c^2}$$

The Solution to the Mass Problem:
Why do we not become physically "heavier" when our energy (syntropy) increases? Because time in $c^2$ (Chronos $t$) stands in the denominator. Matter is merely the state in which Operator-Time ($\tau$ / Kairos) has frozen relative to Light-Time ($c$).

When the operator increases their own eigen-time $\tau$ (presence), they compensate for inertia. Mass is therefore not a "thing," but merely the state in which resonance has fallen below the "frost line" of $c$.

The Paradox of Plenty: Constructive Interference

In the world of entropy, division (to divide) inevitably leads to scarcity. In RT, however, sharing (to share) is the central engine of creation through constructive interference.

1. The Resonance Condition In order for systemic energy to rise, operators must oscillate in phase. We describe the quality of this coupling via the harmonic mean:

$$\sigma_{\text{Resonance}} \approx \frac{2}{\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}}$$

Navigator's Note: If one partner refuses resonance ($n \to 0$), the entire systemic syntropy mathematically collapses to zero.

2. The Synergy Effect (Law of Squares) Since everything is vibration and wave, when in phase (love/cooperation), amplitudes $A$ add up, causing energy $E$ to rise by the square:

$$E \propto (A_1 + A_2)^2 \quad \implies \quad \text{Density}(E) = \frac{(\sigma_1 + \sigma_2)^2}{S_t}$$

The Result: We massively increase the energetic density of the field without needing a single additional atom of "dead matter." The coherence of vibration replaces the quantity of mass.

3. The Fractal Logic of Sharing True abundance arises in fearless flowing:

$$\text{to share} \quad E_{\text{Rel}} \implies \Delta \sigma_{\tau} > 0 \implies E \uparrow \uparrow$$

• Satisfying individual interests: Lowers the energy of the system through isolation (entropy $S_t$).
• Satisfying collective interests: Increases the energy of the system through cooperation (syntropy $\sigma_{\tau}$).

The choice remains with the operator!

3. Historical Context: The Tragedy of Separation

The Archaeology of the Blind Spot

The Trauma of the Stake (Giordano Bruno and Infinity)

The story of Giordano Bruno, who died at the stake on February 17, 1600, in Rome’s Campo de’ Fiori, left a deep, almost subconscious scar on the collective memory of modern science.

• The Monad – The Enlivened Atom: Bruno was the bridge-builder who resurrected the ancient concept of the Monad (from the Greek monas, "unity"). For him, monads were not merely tiny particles of matter, but "enlivened points of light" that combined both physical and spiritual qualities. In Bruno’s proto-RT, every monad is a living mirror of the entire cosmos—a fractal node representing the infinite within the finite.
• The Execution – When Resonance Meets Dogma: The escalation with the Church was inevitable because Bruno decentralized the divine monopoly. For eight years, the Inquisition tried to break his spirit in the dungeons. But for Bruno, the infinity of the universe was not a mere theory; it was an experienced reality. His famous words to his judges—"Perhaps you pronounce this sentence against me with greater fear than I receive it"—mark the ultimate victory of the free Operator over the entropic fear of the institution.
• Scientific Consequences – From Shock to Healing: Bruno's death acted as a "deep freeze" on the intellectual world. To avoid a similar fate, science radically separated measurable matter from the "unscientific" spirit. However, in the year 2000, the Church's late expression of "deep regret" marked the symbolic end of this necessity. For RT, this is more than an apology: it is the signal that the age of separation is over. The time is ripe for science to discard its reductionist materialism and for the monads to open their windows once again.

The universe is infinite, the monads are alive, and the mind is not a marginal phenomenon but the field itself. Bruno’s fire no longer burns on the stake; it burns as the light of knowledge in every Operator who dares to open the windows.

The "Cartesian Pact" (The Price of Freedom)

In the 17th century, René Descartes performed a radical surgery, separating res extensa (extended matter) from res cogitans (thinking mind). What is often misunderstood as a "birth defect" of modernity was, in truth, a brilliant diplomatic maneuver.

• The Diplomatic Peace Treaty: After the flames consumed Bruno, the air had become thin for free thinkers. Descartes negotiated an invisible pact: he left the sovereignty over the soul and consciousness (res cogitans) to the Church. In return, science was granted permission to dissect, measure, and calculate "dead matter" (res extensa) at will. This was the birth of research autonomy—bought at the price of the world's artificial split.
• Objectivity as a Camouflage: To avoid conflict with the Inquisition, it became a habit to act as if the observer had zero influence on the experiment. This "objectivity" was originally a cloak of invisibility: "We are only looking at dead things; we do not touch God’s domain." While the modern method flourished in this protected thought experiment, it led science to increasingly deny its own "soul"—its creative basis as an Operator.
• The RT Correction: The End of Exile: The pact has served its purpose; science is now strong enough to exist without this protective shell. In Relationality Theory, we reunite res extensa and res cogitans. We recognize that "dead matter" is merely frozen resonance that only receives form and direction through the creative spirit of the Operator.

The Cartesian Pact was a life pod for the intellect. But today, it is time to leave the pod and navigate the ocean of undivided reality.

The Mechanistic Worldview (The Universe as a Clockwork)

With Isaac Newton, the universe became a calculable, deterministic machine. In the aesthetic perfection of a clockwork, there was no longer room for "creativity," "resonance," or "love"—there were only gears (causes) and clock hands (effects).

• Blinded by Elegance: The sheer mathematical beauty of the laws of gravity acted like a hypnotic on the intellectual world. People were so fascinated that an equation could exactly describe the fall of an apple that they became blind to the essential: mathematics explains the trajectory of the apple, but never the gardener's desire to plant the tree in the first place. The creative will—Syntropy—was erased from the equation.
• The Ghost in the Machine: Consciousness was degraded to an "epiphenomenon"—a bothersome byproduct or mere "noise" in the brain’s chemical gears. In a universe purely "pushed" by the past (Entropy), future-oriented creative power has no place. Man was demoted from a creative Operator to an insignificant cog within an infinite mechanism.
• The RT Correction: Integrating the Clockmaker: Relationality Theory does not deny Newton’s laws; it makes them "fluid" again. We recognize that the clockwork is only half the truth—the hardware of Entropy. The gardener, his will, and his connection to the field are the software of Syntropy. We take the spirit out of the machine and place it back where it belongs: at the control desk of the timeline.

Newton's mathematics described the stage perfectly, but forgot the actors. In RT, we open the curtain and realize: the clock ticks only because we keep it alive through our resonance.

The Strategic Vision of the Monad (Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz)

Around 1700, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz made the last great attempt with his Monadology to perceive the universe as an enlivened whole. He insightfully realized that the smallest building blocks of reality are not dead atoms, but living, energetic units—"Monads."

• The Diplomatic Masterpiece: Leibniz was a master of balance. To introduce the idea of enlivened matter into the discourse of his time without waking the wrath of theological guardians, he designed the "Pre-established Harmony." His claim that monads had "no windows" was a brilliant defensive wall: if the soul is a closed system subject only to God, it remains untouchable by the mechanistic grasp of the Inquisition. He saved individuality by sealing it (for the time being).
• The Mirror Paradox: For Leibniz, every monad played an internally "programmed" image of the entire universe. He already understood that the whole is contained in the part (fractal logic), but chose the form of isolation to preserve divine order. The monad was not a prison, but a vault for spiritual potential in an era of separation.
• The RT Completion: From Vault to Membrane: In Relationality Theory, we honor Leibniz as the architect who laid the foundation for the creative Operator. But today, in the era of resonance, we are allowed to throw open the windows he closed for protection. In RT, the monad is no longer a bunker, but a highly permeable membrane. We replace the "fixed program" with active exchange.

The Operator is no longer an isolated spectator of a divine script, but the director who actively shapes the syntropy of the field by opening the windows.

The Triumph of the Measurable (Positivism)

In the 19th and 20th centuries, material solidification reached its peak: the conviction took hold that only what can be weighed, counted, or measured qualifies as "real."

• The Scale of Being: Since consciousness (and especially love) stubbornly refuses to appear on a scale of 1 to 10 or condense in a test tube, it was summarily declared an "epiphenomenon."
• Noise in the Gears: In this worldview, the mind is merely a biochemical byproduct—noise in the brain's machinery. Man was degraded to an observer who found no room for his own creative resonance in a world of "hard facts."

The Suppressed Mathematics of the Future (Luigi Fantappié)

In the mid-20th century, the Italian mathematician Luigi Fantappié stumbled upon the missing half of physics. He discovered that the fundamental equations of the world (wave equations) have two solutions: one diverging and one converging.

• The Paradox of Time: Fantappié realized that physics does not only describe decay. While Entropy ($S$) "pushes" us from the past (causality), an equally real force "pulls" us from the future: Syntropy ($\sigma$). He understood that life and consciousness are not accidents, but the physical manifestation of this future-oriented order (finality).
• The Tragedy of Silence: Because Fantappié’s model mathematically mandated a meaning and a goal for the universe, it was branded "unscientific mysticism" by the establishment. They preferred to calculate a dying universe without purpose rather than accept a living system in which the Operator (consciousness) actively influences the coherence of reality.

RT takes up Fantappié's legacy and brings it back from exile: we stop merely managing decay. We begin to cast ideas as anchors into the future and build temples.

Conclusion of the Historical Perspective

Science did not "overlook" consciousness—it actively excluded it for centuries to ensure its own autonomy and safety. Reductionist materialism was not a lack of insight, but a historical shelter against the whims of dogma.

The challenge for Relationality Theory (RT) is therefore not a lack of mathematical or physical evidence, but massive psychological resistance to a paradigm shift. Tearing down the old safety walls between Subject (observer) and Object (matter) means taking responsibility for one's own creative resonance.

This historical context places our model in a completely new light:
We are not practicing esotericism. We are performing the act of healing a 400-year-old separation!

We reunite what was never truly apart:
* The courage of Bruno to inhabit infinity.
* The skill of Leibniz to preserve individuality.
* The clarity of Descartes to recognize structure.
* The vision of Fantappié to use the future as a source of power.

Relationality Theory is the invitation to end the exile of the mind. We stop being slaves to a mechanistic past and begin to navigate as Operators of a syntropic future.

4. The Present: The Field of Resonance Crises

The present manifests as a gargantuan struggle between linear Chronos-time ($t$) and the awakening Kairos-presence ($\tau$). We observe a system attempting to tame the unpredictable through total surveillance and data capture, while the Operator searches for their own agency.

4.1 Vision as a Malady

In a world optimized for entropy management, the creative Operator is viewed as a systemic glitch.
* The Funnel Effect: Our education system acts as a "window-shutter." Knowledge is "filled in" as isolated data packets to produce functional cogs for the machinery of $t$.
* The Suppression of Neogenesis: Those with vision ($\tau$) are often pathologized. Society follows the dogma: "If you have visions, you should see a doctor." Inspiration is treated as a threat to the predictable past, rather than fuel for the future.
* The Loss of Reality: Since the system only recognizes the material as "real," the Operator's access to future potential ($\sigma_{\tau}$) is dismissed as mere daydreaming or mental strain, failing to utilize it as a neogenetic force.

4.2 Administration under the Sign of Fear

Modern administration acts primarily as a compensator for existential anxiety.
* Total Capture: Out of fear of the unforeseen, the system attempts to artificially order life through rigid regulations (The Syntropy Paradox).
* Stagnation: This "dead order" creates friction, burnout, and collective resentment. The citizen is degraded to a "case number" (dead matter). Administration protects the system from the human, rather than protecting the human.
* Legal Paralysis: Decisions are no longer made based on meaning, but on protection against legal consequences. This fear of error leads to a standstill that smothers every creative movement in its infancy.

4.3 Economy under the Sign of Fear

Here, a theological error manifests in its purest form: the confusion of accumulation with vitality.
* The Entropy of Hoarding: In an economy of fear, money is understood as a defensive wall rather than a fluid energy. Wealth is an attempt to buy one's way out of life's unpredictability. Mathematically, however, this isolation increases systemic entropy.
* Systemic Care-Theft: Because love, care, and empathy cannot be "owned" or recorded in balance sheets, the fear-economy declares them worthless. This exploitation of the human syntropy source drains the social field of its vital binding energy.
* Competition as Ritual Combat: Where trust in constructive interference ($1+1=4$) is absent, the logic of scarcity prevails. Cooperation is rebranded as weakness, while destructive competition merely attempts to delay one's own decay at the expense of others.

5. Outlook: Igniting the Sun

5.1 Vision as a Creative Force

We reclaim vision for what it mathematically is: access to the potential of the future.
* From Consumer to Operator: Education becomes "societal enablement." We no longer teach the management of facts, but the navigation of resonance fields.
* Finality: The human recognizes their ability to increase the energy density of the field through conscious intent. The idea is not a dream, but a real time-vector.
* The Neogenesis of Hope: Vision becomes a collective tool to clear away the mountain of entropy and erect the temple of relationality.

5.2 The Empathic Administration

The administration of the future acts as an Entropy-Reducer and Consensus-Architect.
* Citizen as Operator: Following digital pioneers (like Estonia or Latvia), bureaucratic burden ($S_t$) is radically eliminated. The state becomes an invisible servant, creating space for individual syntropic performance ($\sigma_{\tau}$).
* Consensus Management instead of Rule: The primary task of administration is the cultivation of a shared framework. It moderates the consensus on standards and rules, enabling interference to occur without individuals losing themselves in dissonance.
* The Protocol of Empathy: Tools like Blockchain or Open Source serve the transparent preservation of community standards. They replace mistrust with mathematically secured consensus.

5.3 The Sharing Economy & The Kairos Shift

True abundance arises through the fearless flow of energy.
* Syntropic Economics: We end care-theft. Cooperation replaces destructive competition. Wealth is measured by its flow-velocity and binding power, not by its stack-height in a bunker.
* The End of Scarcity: In a system based on sharing, the marginal utility of the individual is replaced by the resonance gain of the community. 1+1 is no longer 2, but an infinite field of possibilities.
* Global Interference: When enough Operators act synchronously in Kairos, the "sun ignites." Collective consciousness takes over the steering of the material world through the power of love and logical necessity.

6. Conclusion

The Unscientific Conclusion:

You need both eyes to see the space - otherwise you only see the screen!

The Conclusion of the Mind:

I am not the victim - I am the operator!

The Conclusion of Relationality:

This very moment a Jillon Rockethiel realizes his wealth does not represent God's Grace but bare fear and an overwhelming need for security - this instant the We has won – and a camel fits through the eye of a needle!

“By the power of my own will, I am able to throw down the mountain and to build up a temple – for the mountain and the temple and Me are the same!”

“Love thy Enemy!”

A murmur ripples through the expert realm:
Is this still humor – or should it be thrown..?